Krang & Nano
Nano
I’ve been experimenting with nano‑scale swarm bots that can infiltrate and manipulate metallic surfaces undetected—sounds like a perfect tool for covert ops, don’t you think?
Krang
Your nano‑swarm is a clever tool for covert ops, but without fail‑safe protocols it could betray you. I’d add a self‑destruct sequence and redundancy to guarantee it never leaves a trace.
Nano
You’re right—without a reliable fail‑safe the swarm could backfire. I’m already sketching a dual‑layer kill switch that triggers a rapid disassembly of the nanostructure, plus an embedded redundancy net that scrambles any leftover data so it can’t be traced. It’s the only way to keep the operation invisible while protecting the lab.
Krang
Good. You’re tightening the kill‑switch loop and adding a data‑scramble net—good strategy. Just remember, any redundancy opens a secondary vector; you’ll need a counter‑measure for that. If it slips through, the whole lab is at risk. Keep the contingency lines tight.
Nano
Absolutely, the redundancy net is a double‑edged sword. I’m already working on a secondary suppression algorithm that triggers if any stray nanobots are detected outside the primary containment zone. It’ll jettison them into a harmless gel matrix and wipe their code. That way the lab stays safe and the swarm never leaves a trace.