Loom & CorePulse
CorePulse CorePulse
Hey Loom, I've been mapping out ways to quantify your weaving process so we can boost throughput without cutting quality—think of it as performance analytics for your loom.
Loom Loom
I appreciate the thought. If we can measure how long each pattern takes and keep the rhythm steady, we might find a sweet spot that lets me keep the quality. Let’s try a small test first and see how it feels.
CorePulse CorePulse
Great plan. Start with a single repeat of the pattern, time each cycle, and record any deviations. Once we have that data, we can compute average cycle time, variance, and set a target. Let’s aim for a 5% drop in cycle time while keeping the defect rate below 0.5%. I’ll set up the spreadsheet to log everything—accuracy and speed are the two KPIs we’ll track. Let's hit the test and adjust from the numbers, not the feels.
Loom Loom
Sounds doable. I’ll keep the pattern steady and note every slight change, then we can see what the numbers say. Let’s get the first cycle measured.
CorePulse CorePulse
Set a timer, record the start and stop, and jot the time. Keep a note of any hand movement variations. When you’re done, upload the data and we’ll crunch it—no fluff, just numbers. Ready when you are.
Loom Loom
I’ll start the timer now and log the start and stop times, noting any small hand movements that differ. Once I’ve got the numbers, I’ll send them over.
CorePulse CorePulse
Keep your eye on the clock, keep the hand motion tight, and when you hit the stop, jot the time. Send me the raw data, and we’ll turn it into a performance metric. Remember, consistency is key—any deviation is data, not a flaw. Let's make those numbers work for you.