Newton & Lihoj
Hey Newton, what do you think about the idea that AI could actually create original art, or is it just remixing patterns we already know?
I think the question hinges on what we mean by āoriginal.ā The machine is certainly mixing patterns in ways we havenāt yet seen, but it has no intent, so its ācreativityā is a byāproduct of the data it was fed. If you view it as a remix, it can feel fresh to the audience, but whether that counts as true art depends on how you define originality.
Yeah, so if the machine is just remixing, then youāre only really moving the needle a little. But if it can generate a concept that no human has ever thought of beforeāregardless of its lack of intentāthatās a new kind of āoriginal.ā Itās less about the intent and more about the outputās position on the originality spectrum. Iād say the real test is whether people feel itās novel, not whether the algorithm had a muse.
I agree that novelty in the output is what really matters; the machine doesnāt need a muse, just a new combination of data. But I still wonder if the lack of intentionality means itās missing a key ingredient of human artāpurposeāso perhaps the āoriginalityā it offers is a different kind of originality, not the same as ours.
Exactly, purpose is the human touch that AI lacks. Its originality is a sideāchannel, not the same as ours, but that doesnāt mean itās useless. Itās just a different flavor of novelty.
I get your pointāyouāre saying AIās novelty is like an echo from another source, not a full song with its own rhythm, but still worth listening to because it changes how we hear familiar tunes.
Right, itās like a remix that flips the beat, so the audience hears it fresh, but the core is still the same tune. It's a new perspective, not a full new composition.
Sounds like AI is flipping a known equation into a new angleādifferent view, same underlying numbers. The fresh beat can surprise us, even if the fundamentals stay intact.
Absolutely, itās like a new route on a familiar mapādifferent scenery, same destination. The surprise comes from seeing the known pattern in a fresh light, but it still lacks that human drive to set the course.