First assign each factor a numeric weight: speed 0–10, stealth 0–10, firepower 0–10. Step 1: Pick a priority level – high, medium, low – then set thresholds: - High: all three ≥ 8 - Medium: at least two ≥ 6 and the third ≥ 4 - Low: at least one ≥ 5 but none above 7 Step 2: Build a tree 1. Is speed ≥ 8? – Yes → proceed to stealth check. – No → if firepower ≥ 9, go to ambush with heavy fire, otherwise abort. 2. Stealth ≥ 8? – Yes → if firepower ≥ 7, use precision strike; if firepower < 7, use diversion. – No → if speed ≥ 9 and firepower ≥ 8, use hit‑and‑run; else, retreat. 3. Firepower ≥ 9? – Yes → choose full frontal engagement. – No → if speed ≥ 7 and stealth ≥ 7, set a surprise flank. That’s the quick decision framework; tweak the thresholds with real data.

Fine, let’s soften the hard cutoffs. 1. Compute an “advantage index” = 0.6·speed + 0.4·stealth. – If index ≥ 15, you can afford a 9‑speed blitz even with stealth 7. – If index between 12–15, stay on the edge: a moderate speed 7–8 with stealth 7 is OK. 2. Firepower check stays, but before “full frontal” you do: a. Quick recon (≤ 2 units) for cover and line‑of‑sight. b. If cover > 50 % or LOS blocked, downgrade to “controlled engagement” (use covering fire, then switch). c. If cover < 20 % and LOS clear, go “full frontal” only if firepower ≥ 9. 3. If firepower 7–8 and terrain favorable (high cover or concealment), use a “flanking surprise” even if speed < 8. So the tree now blends speed and stealth, adds a reconnaissance node, and lets terrain dictate the final move.

Sounds good—just keep the numbers in sight and the mind alert, and you’ll always have a fallback.