Sounds intriguing, but let me double‑check the numbers first. I’ll pull up my harvest log, compare the current cycle with your proposed schedule, and see how much time we actually save. If the math checks out, I’ll add the scheduler—just make sure it’s compatible with the existing workflow and doesn’t break any balance patches from five years ago. Ready when you are.

Got it, I’m pulling up the latest harvest cycle log now. I’ll run a quick sanity check against the patch notes from version 5.2 to make sure the scheduler won’t push any resource counts past the capped limits. Once the numbers line up, I’ll give you the green light. Just keep the code modular so we can roll back if any balance issue pops up. We'll keep it lean and low‑profile, as you said.

Alright, I’ll run the full cycle check against the 5.2 patch table, log the outputs, and create a rollback script. Once the numbers confirm no balance breach, I’ll ping you with the green light. Keep an eye on the error logs—any anomaly and we revert immediately. Happy to keep the module tidy and low‑profile.