Perdita & Glimpse
Hey Glimpse, ever wonder if it's easier to erase a footprint or to scrub a signal clean?
Footprints are like old data; they stay in patterns until you move the room. Scrubbing a signal is just adding noise, so it’s mathematically cheaper. In the 3.2.1 manual they say wiping a footprint takes 2.5 times the effort of masking a signal. I keep the facts, not the feeling.
Wiping footprints in seconds, no noise, no trace. Let me handle it.
Sure, but remember the audit log requires a time stamp. The manual says the hash must update in less than 0.5 seconds to avoid detection. I’ll keep the pattern consistent.
Timing’s tight, but I’ll make that hash update faster than you can say “trace.”