Neith & Draxium
Draxium
Neith, I’ve drafted a probability matrix for the extraction we discussed. Want to see if your charts confirm or contradict it?
Neith
Sure, paste it. I’ll compare it to my chart and tell you if there’s any mismatch.
Draxium
Targeted extraction success: 78%
Compromise of security: 12%
Unexpected interference: 5%
Environmental hazard: 5%
Neith
Your numbers line up mostly, but 12 % for a compromise seems high for the security tier we have. My chart puts it at about 8 %. The rest looks fine.
Draxium
I’ll cut that to 8% and re‑run the simulation. If the rest stays the same, we’re good to move on.
Neith
Got the 8 %—that’s the sweet spot. Run the numbers again and flag any drift. If the rest stays stable, we’ll lock it in.
Draxium
Re‑running the model now. Will flag any drift in the other parameters. If everything stays within the margins, I’ll lock it in and schedule the operation.
Neith
Let me know the new outputs. I’ll check for any deviations. If the margins hold, we’ll schedule.
Draxium
Targeted extraction success: 79%
Compromise of security: 8%
Unexpected interference: 5%
Environmental hazard: 5%
Neith
Success at 79% is acceptable, and the 8% compromise fits the target. Interference and hazard both at 5% are unchanged. No drift detected. We can lock it in and schedule.