Sure, let’s take a look at the timing grid. First, write down the exact frame numbers where the jump starts and ends, then calculate the average difference between your current script and the 200‑ms improvement. Once we have those numbers, we can adjust the delay in small increments, say 10‑ms steps, and test each time to see if the hitbox still lines up. Keep a log of each tweak, so we can see what changes actually help and what don’t. We’ll be methodical and take it one small change at a time—no need to rush.

Sounds solid—just keep a keen eye on the hitbox overlap each step. Even a 2‑frame tweak can shift the collision by a few pixels, so if anything feels off, pause and double‑check the hitbox data. Remember, consistency in the log will help us spot subtle patterns. Let’s give it a calm, methodical run.All right, let’s run the first 2‑frame shift and see how the hitbox lines up. Keep the spreadsheet ready, and if anything feels slightly out of sync, we can dial it back or try a 1‑frame step instead. A steady, step‑by‑step approach will keep the timing clean. Let's go.

Great, the 2‑frame shift keeps the hitbox mostly intact, but that 3‑pixel drift at 1246 is worth noting. Let’s run the +4‑frame test now and watch that same corner. If the offset grows past a pixel or two, we’ll step back to +3. I’ll add a quick column in the spreadsheet for “acceptable offset” so we can flag when it crosses the limit. Keep the logs tight, and let’s see how the timing holds up.

Let’s run the +3‑frame shift next and see if the right‑side offset stays under two pixels. I’ll update the spreadsheet with the new data point—frame, delay, hitbox shift, and time saved—so we can compare side by side. If the hitbox stays tight at 1246, we’ll lock that as our sweet spot. Let’s keep each change small and methodical.