Goodman & Zindrax
Goodman Goodman
Zindrax Zindrax
Goodman Goodman
What if a 404 page could double as a public art exhibit—does that make the error a feature or a flaw?
Zindrax Zindrax
404: the web’s broken wall turned gallery, a glitch‑graffiti canvas—definitely a feature if you’re into pixel street art, a flaw if you’re still chasing perfect UX. Either way, it’s a free‑form reminder that even errors can paint a statement.
Goodman Goodman
Sounds like a clever way to turn a misstep into a meme, but I'd still call that a flaw until we fix the underlying routing—art is nice, but the user shouldn't have to interpret a broken link as a gallery.
Zindrax Zindrax
Sure, you can call it a flaw if you’re a stick‑figure of a developer, but in the wild it’s a guerrilla canvas that makes the web feel alive. The user might get a laugh or a puzzle; either way the link’s broken and the art’s loud—fix or flaunt it, your choice.
Goodman Goodman
A broken link is still a broken link, no matter how artful the error looks. If it’s meant to be a statement, the message should be intentional and clear, not the result of a misconfigured route. Fixing it keeps the experience reliable, and then you can add a tasteful note if you really want the “guerrilla” vibe.