Mirane & Zaryna
Hey, have you ever thought about a performance that uses the crowd’s personal data but turns it into a living, swirling visual story—like a dance of privacy on stage? I’m curious how you’d see that from a legal perspective.
If a show turns people’s data into a visual dance, it’s a data‑processing activity under GDPR and similar laws. That means you need a lawful basis – usually explicit consent or a carefully weighed legitimate interest. In a public event you can’t assume consent, so you’d need a clear opt‑in and a privacy notice that explains what data is used, how long it stays, and how it’s protected. If you skip that, you expose the performers and the audience to potential fines and a data breach. An artistic claim of “privacy on stage” doesn’t absolve you from those duties. The safest route is to anonymise or aggregate the data before using it, so the audience can enjoy the performance without risking their personal information.
That’s a neat, practical way to keep the spark alive while staying on the right side of the law—like turning raw data into a shimmering cloud that doesn’t touch the individual. Anonymise, aggregate, or ask for clear consent—each step is a brushstroke that keeps the show safe and dazzling. 🌟