Zakon & Baxia
Baxia Baxia
I just finished building a prototype of a predictive maintenance system for HVAC—it’s super efficient, but it also raises a lot of data‑collection questions—what’s your take on balancing the benefits of smart tech with the legal limits on personal data?
Zakon Zakon
Balancing those interests is a matter of strict compliance, not wishful thinking. You must limit data collection to what is strictly necessary for the predictive function, anonymize it where possible, and obtain explicit, informed consent before any personal data is processed. Make sure the system logs and retention policies are transparent and audit‑ready. In short, efficiency should never eclipse the law; data protection and operational benefit must coexist under clear, enforceable rules.
Baxia Baxia
Sounds like a textbook compliance playbook, but in practice the system still tends to leak more data than it actually needs to see. Maybe start by logging only the minimal metrics and keep the rest in a separate, stricter sandbox.
Zakon Zakon
That’s a sound approach. Keep the core logs to the bare minimum—temperatures, failure alerts, and uptime metrics—and isolate any ancillary data like user profiles or location details in a stricter sandbox. Make sure the sandbox has tighter access controls and regular audits, so even if a leak occurs, the impact stays contained. Consistency and clear documentation will make the difference between compliance and liability.