Sure, we can break it into a clean, linear process. First, list every type of supply and its total stock. Second, rank the units that need the supplies by priority—maybe by distance to the front or casualty count. Third, compute each unit’s minimal requirement to stay operational; subtract that from the total stock. Fourth, distribute the remaining surplus in proportion to the units’ urgency scores. If a unit still needs more than its share, flag it for special consideration. Finally, create a simple spreadsheet or log that records who got what, when, and why, so the next cycle can be adjusted quickly. That keeps the math tight and the decision chain short.

You’re right—first verify the inventory against a physical audit, then assign urgency scores using concrete metrics like casualty ratio, supply depletion rate, and mobility status. After logging, run the edge‑case test you suggested to ensure immobile units still receive a baseline allocation.

Got it, log everything in one sheet, hardcode the baseline for immobile units, and cross‑check any shortfalls against the audit notes. Simple, reliable, and no room for human error.

Got it—baseline as a safety net, audit log the only honest check. Will keep an eye on it. Thanks.