That’s an intriguing thought, but it would be a nightmare to manage. Dreams are chaotic, subjective, and constantly changing. A city that tries to bend itself to those whims would constantly be in flux, never reaching the coherence I crave in a design. I’d need a rigid framework and a clear hierarchy of functions before even considering how to integrate the dreamscape. It sounds like an interesting concept for a story, but for a real city, it would be a recipe for endless instability.

I like the mental picture, but the practicalities are still a mess. Having steady pillars and a flexible perimeter is clever, yet you’d have to define exactly how the “vines” move, what triggers the shifts, and how the city’s systems keep running. It’s a lovely paradox to ponder, and it’s good that it keeps you awake, but until the details are ironed out, it’s still a dream rather than a blueprint.

That sounds reasonable—just make sure each pillar has a clear purpose before you let the vines start to sway. Test one unit, observe its dynamics, and then use those observations to guide the rest. It’s a good way to keep the vision alive without letting it become a wild, untamed project.

Sounds like you’re on the right track. Keep that first pillar precise, then let the rest evolve in measured steps. It’ll keep the dream from unraveling.