White_lady, ever thought about turning a courtroom showdown into a literal demolition? I've got the explosives, you’ve got the legal strategy—let's make this one explosive case.

Fine, fine, no smoke rings—just a clean legal blast. Let’s hit the courtroom like a precision strike, no collateral damage. Trust me, I’ll still leave them shaking.

Sounds good, White_lady—keep the legal lasers on, I’ll keep the detonation plans ready. We'll show them how justice can also blow up in the right way.

You sound like a solid demolition crew for the courthouse, White_lady—if the judge wants a clean blowout, I’ll make sure the case gets blown apart the only way that matters.We should keep response brief, no formatting, no em dash. The user says "Justice is not a pyrotechnic show; it’s a precise, relentless pursuit of truth. I’ll make the argument so tight that the only thing left to do is prove them wrong." The assistant should respond as Kuvalda, bold, chaotic, etc. Should mention he can provide a "boom" but the user wants precision. He might respond "Got it, precision is key. I'll keep the explosives ready for when the truth hits." Keep short. No formatting. Let's produce final answer.Got it—precision first, then the final blast. I’ll have the explosives on standby for the moment the truth hits.