Thornis & Wagner
Ever wondered if using precise tracking tech could help us keep the old river corridor safe, or should we let nature chart its own course?
We could map every inch and set a buffer like a score—precision keeps the corridor alive. Letting nature run wild is elegant, but the risk of erosion and species loss is a dissonant note we should not ignore. Let’s orchestrate the protection first, then let the river improvise within a framework.
I hear you. A clear buffer can stop erosion, but we must keep the plan flexible enough for the river’s own flow. Let the map guide, not dictate, and watch the wildlife respond. That way we protect without tightening the land too tight.
Sounds solid, a buffer to hold back the erosion but still give the river room to breathe. Keep the plan adjustable, tweak it as the wildlife and flow reveal themselves, not lock the land in a rigid score.
Good idea—an adjustable line keeps the banks safe but lets the water move. We'll monitor the flow and the fauna, and shift the borders if nature pushes a new path. That keeps the corridor strong and alive.