VortexSniper & Never_smiles
I've been working on how wind drift changes a bullet’s path at long ranges; do you think the usual 1 in 1,000 rule still holds at 1,200 yards?
At 1200 yards the 1‑in‑1000‑yard rule is still a useful back‑of‑the‑envelope check, but it starts to drift off a bit because velocity has dropped and the wind has had more time to act. For a typical rifle round with a BC around 0.4–0.5 the drift is roughly 1 foot per 1000 yards for a 1 mph wind, so about 1.2 feet at 1200 yards. If your bullet is faster or the BC higher, the drift shrinks proportionally. In practice, a ballistic computer that accounts for the exact BC, muzzle velocity and wind vector will give you the precise number, but the rule of thumb still holds within about ±10 %.
That 1‑in‑1,000‑yard drift still gives you a quick estimate at 1,200 yards. The wind has more time to act, so the drift is a bit more, roughly 1.2 feet for a 1‑mph wind if the bullet’s ballistic coefficient is around 0.4–0.5. If the round’s BC is higher, the drift shrinks. In the field, a ballistic calculator that takes the exact BC, muzzle velocity and wind will give the precise number, but the rule of thumb stays useful within about ten percent.
Good recap. Just remember the 1‑in‑1000 rule is linear only for low winds; above about 5 mph the drift starts to increase slightly faster than linearly, and the BC‑dependence gets a bit more pronounced. For anything more precise you’re forced to run the full ballistic model.
Right, the linear rule is only a quick check for mild wind; for higher speeds the drift grows a touch faster and the ballistic coefficient becomes more critical. Running the full model is the only way to keep precision.
Sounds about right. Just watch the numbers; at high wind the math likes to bend and the 1‑in‑1000 line will look like a straight line from a distant planet. Use the calculator, not the hunch.
Got it—calculator over guesswork, always.
No doubt—precision beats intuition every time.