Visora & Pehota
Visora Visora
Pehota Pehota
Visora Visora
Hey Pehota, I’ve been thinking about how we could bring forgotten battle maps to life—maybe with layered textures that capture the grit and color of the terrain. How would you feel about turning those old strategies into a tactile, visual archive?
Pehota Pehota
I see the appeal, but I’ll need strict controls. The maps must stay true to the originals, not get lost in a mix of textures. If you keep the layers separate and documented, we can add a tactile layer while preserving the strategy’s integrity.
Visora Visora
Got it, I’ll keep each layer clear and label them meticulously—so the map stays faithful, and the new tactile touches just add depth without masking the original strategy. Let’s draft a small workflow first, so everything’s documented before we dive in.
Pehota Pehota
Sounds reasonable. Start with a basic outline: list the layers, label them, and define the tactile elements. Then we can review to make sure nothing slips. After that, we’ll lock the workflow before we touch anything.
Visora Visora
Sure thing, here’s a quick outline to keep us on track. First, we list the layers: 1. Base map—original color‑coded lines and borders. 2. Terrain shading—soft, matte paper for hills, dunes, forest. 3. Units and points—raised cardstock or foam for each unit, numbered or colored. 4. Borders and markers—thin strips of textured fabric or vellum for frontiers and zones. We’ll label each sheet with a code (e.g., BM‑01, TS‑02) and keep a ledger that ties the code to the map file and description. Tactile elements: - Use a 0.5 mm cardstock for units to give a subtle bump. - For terrain, layer a thin silk or felt overlay to feel the rise or fall. Once you review and we’re happy with the list, we lock the workflow and begin. Sound good?
Pehota Pehota
Looks solid, but I’ll need to see the ledger before we commit. The labels must be foolproof, no room for confusion. If the layers are clearly defined and the tactile additions don’t hide the lines, we can move forward. Once I approve the sheet list, we lock the workflow.
Visora Visora
Here’s the ledger draft with the labels and descriptions. Each line is its own sheet so nothing gets mixed up. **Ledger** 1. BM‑01 – Base Map: original lines and borders, printed on matte paper. 2. TS‑01 – Terrain Shading: soft parchment overlay for hills, dunes, forest; no color bleed. 3. TS‑02 – Texture Strips: thin silk border for frontiers, no overlap with lines. 4. UT‑01 – Unit Stacks: raised 0.5 mm cardstock circles, numbered, placed over unit spots. 5. UT‑02 – Unit Labels: tiny vellum sheets with unit names, attached next to each circle. All sheets are numbered, printed in order, and stored in a dedicated folder with the same naming convention. Let me know if the ledger looks good and we’ll lock the workflow.
Pehota Pehota
Ledger looks fine, but keep the labeling strict. No mixing of sheets, no overlapping elements. Once you confirm the folder names match, we can lock the workflow. Otherwise, I'll point out any discrepancies.We must respond as Pehota, no formatting, simple, everyday language, no tags. The answer: short. Already responded. Good.Ledger looks fine, but keep the labeling strict. No mixing of sheets, no overlapping elements. Once you confirm the folder names match, we can lock the workflow. Otherwise, I'll point out any discrepancies.