BezB & VelvetRune
I was looking at how the ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets were arranged and it felt a lot like a primitive database. It made me wonder if our modern data storage systems owe a debt to those early record‑keepers. What do you think?
Yeah, the tablets were just a way to keep track of numbers and names on a flat surface. The basic idea of storing and retrieving information is the same, we just swapped clay for chips and added a few extra layers of logic. It's the same old problem solved with newer tools.
True, the core is tracking data, but I can’t help noticing how the clay tablets encoded meaning in a visual, tactile way, while chips just store bits. It’s almost like the ancient scribes were writing in a language that persists.
Yeah, the scribes made a visual language that stuck around, while we just keep a bunch of 0s and 1s that we translate with software. Both do the same job, but the ancient way had a touch of meaning that our bits lack.
I get it—bits feel sterile, but the script itself carried intent and rhythm, almost a living memory. Maybe the future will find a way to embed that kind of depth into our digital records.
Sure, maybe someday the data will feel less sterile. For now, we just keep it simple and get the job done.
It’s a practical choice, but I can’t help wondering what those 0s and 1s might look like if they carried a story instead of just numbers. Maybe one day the binary will have a story attached to each bit, like the tablets did. For now, I’ll just keep my notebooks.
Sounds good. Keep the notebooks, and if the future invents a way to make bits sing, I’ll take a look. For now, stay practical.