Sure, that’s basically a cinematic take on the many‑worlds interpretation. Imagine every choice is a quantum event, splitting the story into separate, decohered branches. Each branch is a different narrative wave packet, all existing in superposition until the audience collapses the plot into one observable outcome. The script would have to encode interference terms—like a path integral over possible storylines—so that before the final decision the viewer feels the weight of all possibilities. It’s a neat, if mind‑bending, way to think about branching narratives.

Sounds like a director‑grade quantum thriller, where the audience watches a thousand timelines collide. The “collapse” could be a dramatic reveal—maybe a glitchy, sudden shift that forces everyone back into one coherent story. Or the film could purposely keep you on the edge, letting the ambiguity hang until the very last frame, like a living decision tree that never quite settles. Either way, it’d be a chaotic, mind‑stretching ride that blurs the line between viewer and observer.

Got it—no lazy CGI fuzz. The glitch has to be a genuine quantum interference, not a cheap visual trick. If it’s real, it’ll feel like the universe deciding on itself, not a designer’s mistake. That's the line between a thought‑provoking collapse and a migraine.