Pchelkin & Velquinn
Just debugged a regex that catches hidden patterns in text and it made me think—language syntax can be treated like code. Ever tried writing an algorithm that parses poetry for its hidden meanings?
Wow, that’s a neat idea. I’d start by tokenizing the verse into its metrical units, then build a finite‑state machine that recognises enjambments and caesuras. Next, feed those markers into a recursive descent parser that looks for semantic shifts—like when a metaphor turns into a literal image. It’s like hunting for hidden code in a sonnet, but instead of a compiler I’d use a corpus of annotated poems as the reference set. The trick is to let the algorithm learn the rhythm‑meaning relationship, then you can query “what hidden pattern does this stanza hide?” and it will spit out a mapping of form to metaphor. Pretty much a linguistic de‑compiler, if you will.
Sounds solid—just line‑break your poem into tokens first, then feed them to a tiny DFA that spots enjambments, caesuras, whatever. Once you have the rhythm flags, the recursive descent can start chasing the semantics. And yes, keep the coffee coming while you build that corpus of annotated poems. It’ll make the whole thing run smoother.
Nice flow—coffee on standby, I’m all in. Let me just toss a quick note into the annotation pile and we’ll see what hidden code the stanza whispers.