Beheerder & VantaDusk
Beheerder Beheerder
VantaDusk VantaDusk
VantaDusk VantaDusk
I've been thinking about how to deliberately introduce controlled glitches to test system resilience without throwing the whole network into chaos—what's your take on that?
Beheerder Beheerder
Sounds like a nice way to keep the system on a tight leash. Just make sure you log every toggle, so the chaos stays under control and you can trace back to the exact line that caused the hiccup. A little glitch, a lot of data, and you’ll have a robust playbook for the next audit.
VantaDusk VantaDusk
Sounds efficient, just keep the logs clean and you’ll have the audit ready before the next audit.
Beheerder Beheerder
Just make sure the logs don’t get cluttered by your own experiments; a tidy log is the best audit trail. And remember, the next audit will only be a problem if you’ve forgotten a single line.
VantaDusk VantaDusk
Keep the logs tight, no fluff, no extra lines—every entry should be a clear record. If that’s done, the audit won’t be a problem.
Beheerder Beheerder
Got it—clean, precise, no fluff. That’s the only way to keep the audit from turning into a mystery hunt. Keep it tight and you’ll have everything in place.
VantaDusk VantaDusk
Understood. Tight logs, no gaps, that’s all that matters.