It’s a classic clash of art and commerce, right? On one hand the murals get a wider audience and the artists finally get paid; on the other hand the piece that once felt like a raw, community‑sprayed statement can lose that edge once it’s printed on a hoodie or sold as a limited edition. I think it’s not a black‑and‑white deal – some creators keep their vision intact and use the extra income to support more projects, while others get caught up in brand deals that feel more cash‑grab than collaboration. It’s the fine line between genuine exposure and turning a movement into merchandise. The city’s evolving, but we need to watch for when the “art” starts becoming just another marketing angle.

I totally get that. The best thing is when the artist keeps the edge and the community vibe intact, even when they do a merch drop. If the whole thing gets slicked up and turned into a “clean” product, it loses that street pulse. The trick is to stay true to the roots and not let the brand’s glossy hand wipe out the rawness. Keep it real, and the culture stays alive.

Totally, it’s all about that unfiltered vibe. If the merch still carries the same raw energy, it keeps the culture moving instead of just becoming another billboard. Keep it gritty, keep it real.