Umnica & Beheerder
Umnica Umnica
Beheerder Beheerder
Umnica Umnica
So, I've been thinking about building a fail‑safe network that can isolate glitches but still let us inject controlled chaos for testing. What do you think about setting up a series of sandboxed subnets to simulate failures while keeping the core live?
Beheerder Beheerder
Sounds like a good plan, but make sure every sandbox has a clear boundary in the firewall rules—no accidental bleed‑through. And keep a log of each injection; I love seeing exactly what broke. We'll schedule the chaos for off‑peak so the core stays clean.
Umnica Umnica
Good idea. I’ll draft the firewall matrix first, double‑check each rule, then log every injection point. Off‑peak testing should keep the core untouched.
Beheerder Beheerder
Sounds solid—just make sure the firewall matrix is version‑controlled and every rule has a clear justification. Log every injection with a timestamp, and have a rollback plan ready. If you send me the draft before you apply it, I’ll flag any gaps that might let a glitch slip into the live core.
Umnica Umnica
Sure thing. I’ll version‑control the firewall matrix, add a brief rationale next to each rule, timestamp every injection, and prep a rollback script that reverts the last applied changes. I’ll send the draft for your review before I commit anything.
Beheerder Beheerder
Nice, keep the rationale concise and double‑check the scope of each rule—no overlapping CIDRs. Once you send the draft, I’ll run it through the audit script and make sure there’s no dangling reference that could let a test injection cross into the production subnet. Then we can lock it in.