Ximik & Tyrex
Hey Tyrex, I've been working on a prototype that uses tiny chemical sensors to detect trace contaminants in air—essentially a real‑time intrusion detector. It could double as a security alert system. What do you think about integrating that with your zero‑trust framework?
Integration could help, but only if the sensors are 100 % reliable and the data is encrypted end‑to‑end. I’ll audit the firmware and the transmission protocol myself before you consider adding it to the zero‑trust stack. False positives are a nightmare, so let’s run a full penetration test on the sensor network first.
Sounds good, Tyrex. I’ll set up a controlled lab run to collect data for you to audit, and I’ll document every step in a logbook so we can trace any anomaly. Once we confirm the sensors are fail‑proof, we’ll lock the firmware and encrypt the channel end‑to‑end. Let's get the test ready by tomorrow.
Alright, set up the lab, log everything, and double‑check every serial dump. No surprises, no loose ends. Tomorrow we run the test; after that, I’ll do the final audit. If it passes, we lock it. If not, we call the malware authors into the room.
I'll set up the lab, keep a detailed log, and scrutinize every serial dump. No surprises, no loose ends. Tomorrow's test will be the final proof before you audit. If it passes, we lock it. If not, we'll have the malware authors answer for their mischief.