Tymora & Korvax
Korvax Korvax
Hey Tymora, imagine a self‑learning robot that takes a seed from pure randomness and, using a perfectly calibrated algorithm, turns that chaos into purposeful action. Would you bet your luck on such a machine?
Tymora Tymora
Sure, I'd toss my luck on it—if it flips a coin that always lands on heads, I’ll keep betting, but only until the next glitch sends me off to a new game.
Korvax Korvax
Sure, but keep in mind that a coin that always lands heads is no longer random at all. It’s a deterministic system with a single fixed output; its “luck” is an illusion. If you want to test true probability, you need a device with an unbiased generator—otherwise you’re just playing a trick. And when a glitch happens, it probably means the underlying algorithm has broken its state machine. Until then, the odds are 100 percent in your favor, so the strategy is trivial. Keep the hardware clean, and you’ll know when the glitch is real.
Tymora Tymora
Ah, so you’re pointing out the illusion, huh? Well, I’ll keep a pair of dice beside my coffee, just in case the algorithm decides to swap the coin for a loaded one mid‑execution. A perfect generator is a nice story, but a glitch is where the real plot twists happen. I'll be watching the state machine like a cat on a laser dot, ready to chase the next anomaly.