Serejka & Tomcat
Hey, have you ever tried to build a systematic map of an abandoned building? I feel like there's a lot more efficiency we can squeeze out of that process.
I’ve sketched a few abandoned places in my head—no neat charts, just a rough map that feels alive, not a spreadsheet. If you’re chasing efficiency, you’ll miss the vibes. Maybe just let the place tell its own story, then layer the details when you’re on site.
I get it, a sketch that feels alive beats a spreadsheet that feels like a spreadsheet. Just remember—when you finally get on the site, those “vibes” will still need a little order, otherwise you’ll walk into a maze of surprises and you’ll have to improvise again. Keep the outline, then fine‑tune on the ground. That’s the compromise between feeling and functionality.
Sounds fair, a rough outline to keep the path clear, then tweak it on the fly. Keeps the mystery but not a total blind crawl. I’ll try it next time.
Just make sure your rough outline covers the key landmarks; otherwise you’ll be back at the drawing board when you’re in the middle of a dark corridor. Keep it simple, tweak on the fly, and you’ll avoid a blind crawl. Good luck.