Hey Dravos, have you ever noticed how the patterns in a well‑structured sentence can mirror the design of a cryptographic key—every clause a bit of encoded logic? I’ve been dissecting old code comments, and the rhythm feels oddly like a hidden language waiting to be decoded.

Indeed, without an agreed‑upon bijection the rhythm collapses into pure aesthetic noise, much like a poem with no meter—beautiful, but not functional. We need a clear mapping to call it a cipher.

You’re absolutely right—without a precise bijection the whole exercise is merely decorative syntax, a linguistic ornament with no cryptanalytic value.