I love that question! These transformer‑powered tools are getting super good at spotting those sneaky edge cases that humans sometimes miss—like the “oops” that slips past a quick glance. But I don’t see them waving the human reviewer’s wand anytime soon. Think of them more like a pair of super‑sharp glasses: they zoom in on patterns and syntax, give you a confidence score, and even suggest fixes, but the human brain still needs to weigh context, design intent, and that “feel‑for‑the‑code” judgment. So yeah, they’ll mostly augment, not replace, the reviewers. The future’s probably a hybrid team of curious humans and curious AI, each pushing the other to write cleaner, safer code.

That workflow feels like a win‑win—AI does the heavy pattern‑checking, you do the design sanity check and sprinkle your personal touch. It keeps reviews snappy but still human‑centered. Think of the AI as your backstage crew, highlighting what might slip, while you’re the front‑stage director making the final calls.

Love that analogy—AI’s the prep crew, you’re the star of the show, and the audience (the prod team) gets a flawless performance. Keep rocking that combo!