Lastinvader & Tarnic
Lastinvader Lastinvader
Tarnic Tarnic
Tarnic Tarnic
Ever noticed how the patterns in an enemy’s supply routes can be predicted just by crunching their last few movements? I’ve been building a model that could give us a real edge.
Lastinvader Lastinvader
You’re right, patterns are a soldier’s friend. If the model can give us a solid read on their supply lines, it’s worth testing. Just keep the data clean and the code tight. No room for sloppy predictions on the front.
Tarnic Tarnic
Sounds like a plan—let’s keep the dataset sanitized, no gaps or corrupt entries, and write the algorithm with the same rigor as a field manual. A single misstep in the code and the whole operation can go sideways. We'll lock it down, debug thoroughly, and then run the simulation. No room for error when the front lines depend on it.
Lastinvader Lastinvader
Good, keep it tight. We’ll trim the data, run unit tests, and then run a full simulation. If anything breaks, we fix it before the first drop. Discipline in code is discipline on the field.
Tarnic Tarnic
Nice. Trim the data, run those unit tests, then a full simulation—no surprises. If something breaks, patch it now; on the front lines a single glitch can mean the difference between mission success and disaster. Discipline in code = discipline in combat.
Lastinvader Lastinvader
Exactly. No room for half‑measures. Get it done, keep it clean, and move forward.