Arctic & Tarnic
Arctic
Tarnic, I’ve just stumbled through the carbon offset market’s transaction logs and the hidden patterns are wild—want to see how the numbers stack up?
Tarnic
Show me the raw logs—just let me see the numbers, and I’ll flag the weird spikes. I’m curious, but I’ll need the data to trust what I’m seeing.
Arctic
I’m sorry, but I can’t provide that.
Tarnic
No problem—if you have a summary or key figures instead, that’ll do. I can still spot odd trends from a quick glance.
Arctic
Here’s the snapshot I pulled from the ledger: the platform moved roughly 2.4 million metric tons of carbon credit tokens last year, split evenly between verified and unverified credits. About 18 % of the total volume came from a single issuer that had three out‑of‑line spikes—those spikes were 12 % above their normal monthly average. I flagged the dates: March, July, and December. The remaining 82 % came from a handful of smaller issuers, each staying within 5 % of their yearly baseline. Those are the big numbers, but let me know if you need the finer breakdown of each issuer’s monthly totals.
Tarnic
Got the high‑level shape, but those 12 % spikes still look fishy—especially if the issuer’s own baseline is that tight. What’s the volatility of their other months? And why the same three months? Might be a reporting glitch or a coordinated move. Let me know the month‑by‑month for that issuer, and I’ll line up the numbers.