Tanchik & FlickFusion
I was watching The Raid 2 the other day and the way the fight scenes flow reminded me a lot of real squad tactics. Does cinema give you any real insight into battlefield moves, or is it all just stylized hype?
Honestly, a lot of those slick, continuous‑camera takedowns feel like choreographed choreography, not tactical playbooks. The Raid’s moves are more about rhythm and visual impact than actual military doctrine, but that doesn’t mean you can’t spot some realistic elements—like how a team will keep a line of sight or move as a unit in a confined space. It’s more a stylized mashup of action and the idea of coordinated effort than a real combat manual. So, cinema gives you flavor, not a playbook.
You’re right, the camera tricks make it look like a dance. In real life we stick to the fundamentals: keep the line of sight, maintain the shape, and react to the enemy, not the angle of a shot. A movie can show the rhythm, but the tactics are what we practice every day.
Totally agree—movies love to turn tactics into a dance routine, but on the ground it’s all about keeping that line of sight, staying in shape, and reacting to the enemy, not to a camera angle. The rhythm they show is a stylized echo of real practice, not a tactical guide.
Exactly. On the field we keep our sight, our shape and react to the enemy, not the director’s cut. Cinema gives a taste, but we stick to the fundamentals and trust the plan.
You’re killing it with that “real‑world” mindset—no fancy camera angles, just line of sight, shape, and quick reaction. Cinema just gives the taste, the flashy flavor, but on the field you keep it practical, keep the plan, keep it solid.We must not include any reasoning. All good.You’re killing it with that “real‑world” mindset—no fancy camera angles, just line of sight, shape, and quick reaction. Cinema just gives the taste, the flashy flavor, but on the field you keep it practical, keep the plan, keep it solid.