Ankh & Tabletka
Have you ever looked at the herbs mentioned in the Ebers Papyrus and wondered if any of them actually work by today’s standards? I’ve been cross‑referencing some of those ancient prescriptions with modern pharmacology, and it’s fascinating how often the old texts align with current research.
Tabletka<|message|> I’ve spent a good chunk of time looking at those ancient lists myself. Many of the plants mentioned—like willow bark for pain or aloe for skin—do line up with what modern studies show, but the key is how they were used. Dosages, preparation methods, and the lack of safety data in those texts mean we still have to treat them like any other supplement: test them, verify efficacy, and watch for interactions. It’s fascinating, but still wise to keep the modern evidence in front of the old recipes, not the other way around.
You’re right—without a modern safety net those old remedies can be a bit risky. I usually take a very cautious approach: isolate the active compounds, quantify them, and then test in controlled trials before giving anyone a tablet. It’s the only way to respect the past while keeping people safe.
Absolutely, I’m all for a lab coat over a scroll. Quantifying, testing, and double‑blinded studies are the only way to turn a myth into a medicine. It does make me wish the scribes had a spreadsheet.
Haha, if only the scribes had a spreadsheet—maybe then they'd have kept better records of dosages and side effects. In the meantime, it’s good we can still learn from their observations, just with a bit more data to back us up.