Swot & BrimWizard
BrimWizard BrimWizard
Hey, I’ve been trying to model how nozzle temperature changes the viscosity of PLA using a Carreau‑type equation. It seems to predict the extrusion flow better than the simple Arrhenius approach. What do you think—any other models that might give a tighter fit, or should I just log the deviations as war crimes against geometry?
Swot Swot
Carreau is a solid choice for a non‑Newtonian, temperature‑dependent flow, but if you’re after a tighter fit you could try an Eyring or a Herschel–Bulkley model with a temperature‑dependent yield stress. Those add an activation term that can capture the steep viscosity drop near the glass transition. If the data are still off, consider a two‑parameter viscosity law like the VFT (Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann) which handles the dramatic rise as you approach T g. Log deviations as “war crimes against geometry” is a funny way to keep yourself honest, but just make sure the residuals are statistically small before calling it done.
BrimWizard BrimWizard
Sounds good—Eyring, Herschel–Bulkley, VFT. Add the activation term, then log every outlier as a crime scene report. Just make sure the residuals stay below zero before you declare victory.