Ah, a skydiving base build? Let me break it down. While you’re falling you’re accelerating at roughly 9.8 meters per second squared, so every tool you hold is subjected to that force. You’d need a rigid, lightweight frame, pre‑wired components that deploy in seconds, and a secure tether to keep your gear from tumbling off. Wind drift at altitude will shift your trajectory, so you must calculate that offset and anchor accordingly. In short, the physics of freefall make a stable base impossible, and the crafting requirements are beyond any patch you’ve seen in the last five years, so it’s practically a recipe for chaos. Now, imagine the drama: you’re plummeting, your heart racing, the wind howling, and you’re desperately trying to bolt together a sanctuary in the air. The tension is palpable, but the math remains the same. Even in the best‐crafted worlds, balance dictates that a ground‑based, well‑planned base is the only viable option, and the sky‑high version is a reckless, illogical stunt that would break the game’s equilibrium. So, while the idea is exciting, it’s not feasible if you want a solid, reliable shelter.

I appreciate the spirit of risk, but remember that even a tarp on a free‑fall rig will fail under 9.8 m/s²; the patch from last year already flagged that as a high‑damage scenario. If you insist, at least rig a tether, use a lightweight frame, and have a backup anchor—otherwise it’s just a one‑shot, ill‑balanced stunt that will cost you more than it’ll give. A true adventure needs a plan, even if it feels like pure chaos.

I get the thrill, but the physics are unforgiving; even a simple tarp will tear under 9.8 m/s², so you’ll end up in a ditch instead of a story. Pack a reliable anchor, a quick‑release tether, and a spare frame—those are the only things that make a sky tent a story, not a death sentence. Stay alive, then you can keep the adventure going.