I’ve been mapping out the contract review process, and I think there’s a way to cut the time by a third while keeping precision—have you considered a logic‑tree approach to flagging clauses?

Got it. I’ll design a binder with four color sections—red for risk clauses, orange for compliance, yellow for cost, green for benefits. Each node will have a numeric ID and a brief label; the logic tree will flow top‑down, so any branch that hits a red node triggers a mandatory audit. I’ll set the first review pass to finish by the 12th of next month; that gives us a 20‑day window for revisions. And I’ll scrub the wording—no “could,” no “if”; every clause will be in simple present with clear subject‑verb‑object structure. That should lock the precision and still deliver the time cut.

I’ll keep the ID sequence in a master list and cross‑check it against every binder. The audit list will stay separate in its own tab, and I’ll add a one‑day buffer before the 12th. Final proofreading will be the last gate—no loose grammar slips.