Sure. Wind’s main influence on projectiles is the drag force and the Magnus effect for spin‑stabilized rounds. If you can measure the wind speed at the same height as the barrel, you get a reliable value for that drag, which lets you adjust the angle or power to compensate. Guessing by feel is highly subjective and ignores local turbulence. An anemometer gives you a repeatable, quantifiable input—roughly a 10–20 % improvement in hit probability for high‑velocity, long‑range shots, especially when wind shifts rapidly. For short‑range or low‑power engagements the margin is smaller, but still better than blind guessing. So, from a tactical standpoint, the sensor provides a measurable edge and reduces uncertainty.

Instinct can be useful for quick decisions, but it lacks the precision of measured data. If the crew can trust the numbers, they'll keep their focus on the mission rather than guessing. Still, having a quick gut check can serve as a sanity check, just don’t let it override the sensor reading when accuracy matters.