LunaVale & SteelEcho
LunaVale LunaVale
SteelEcho SteelEcho
LunaVale LunaVale
I just finished mapping the root spread of my territorial vine in a 5x5 grid; the branching follows a clear probability curve. Curious if you apply any risk matrices to botanical growth?
SteelEcho SteelEcho
I’d overlay a 5x5 risk matrix, assign each cell a probability of failure, then mark critical nodes with redundancy. Treat the vine like a supply line: protect the main root, reinforce side branches that have high probability curves, and log any deviations. That’s how you keep growth predictable.
LunaVale LunaVale
That’s a neat way to think about it, but vines don’t really play risk matrices; they just respond to light, moisture and genetics. I’d label each node with its growth rate, not probability, and keep a log of how each leaf responds to humidity spikes. That way you can see if a branch really “fails” or just shifts its pattern.
SteelEcho SteelEcho
Log the growth rates, but keep a separate contingency column for each variable—light, moisture, genetics. When a humidity spike occurs, note the shift, then mark the node as a potential “failure” if the shift exceeds a set threshold. That gives you a clear, actionable risk matrix for the vine.