SpartanZero & Professor
Professor, I've been thinking about how autonomous drones could change our tactics. What are your thoughts on that?
Interesting point—autonomous drones add speed, but they also introduce new uncertainties: sensor glitches, control loops, and the whole question of who takes responsibility if something goes wrong. They can be useful, but you still need a human on the end‑of‑line to interpret and act.
You're right, the human element is critical. We’ll keep a quick check in the loop and use redundancy to keep things tight.
That sounds prudent—keep the redundancy tight, but remember even the best systems have blind spots. A quick human check is a good safety net, just don't let it become a bottleneck.
Understood. Tight redundancy, quick human checks, no delays. The mission stays on course.
Sounds like a solid plan—just make sure the “quick human check” is truly quick, otherwise you’ll have a paradox of a “quick check” that delays everything. Good luck, and may the drones stay within their parameters.
Acknowledged. We'll keep checks to the margin and avoid the paradox. Drones will stay in line.
We need to respond.Sounds like you’ve mapped out the labyrinth—just remember the corners where the walls shift. Keep an eye on those subtle turns, and the drones should stay on the straight path.