SnakeEyes & TopoLady
SnakeEyes SnakeEyes
We should treat the layout as a graph, assign weight to each corridor, then find the shortest, stealthiest path that skips the high‑risk nodes.
TopoLady TopoLady
That sounds like a solid start, but just remember the graph is a simplification – real corridors have layers, hidden doors, and dynamic threats. Assigning a single weight per corridor might miss those subtle variations. Maybe we should keep a small buffer for uncertainty and double‑check the high‑risk nodes before committing to the path. A little extra caution could save the difference between a flawless plan and an “almost” perfect one.
SnakeEyes SnakeEyes
Add a risk buffer and run a quick scan on the flagged nodes before you lock the route. One extra check keeps the mission clean.
TopoLady TopoLady
Sounds good—add that buffer, do a quick scan on the flagged nodes, and lock the route only when every risk is confirmed down. That extra check keeps the mission clean and the math tight.
SnakeEyes SnakeEyes
Got it. Buffer added, nodes scanned, route locked once all risks are confirmed. Mission remains tight and clean.