Skye & FXPulse
Hey, I was looking at the early 20th century special effects used in silent movies and got curious about how those primitive techniques compare to the precision we chase with shaders now. Ever thought about the lineage from hand‑painted frames to your lightning bolt code?
Sure, it’s a long line of mischief. Those early filmmakers painted each frame, a slow, glorified type of hand‑made shader that had to be perfect before the projector spun. Now I’m tweaking a few dozen lines of GLSL, and every value has to fall into place exactly, or the bolt looks like a drunk cat. The precision is the same, just the tools and the deadlines are different. If you ever need a lightning bolt that feels like a symphony, let me know – I’ll make it as messy or as clean as you want.
Thanks, I might take you up on that. I’m still trying to get the charge line to look natural—maybe it’s the wrong normal map? It’s the same old problem of making the math feel right without it looking off. Do you have any tricks for keeping a GLSL lightning bolt from looking too clean?
Yeah, the trick is to make it *almost* perfect and then sprinkle in the chaos that real lightning never obeys. First, throw in a small amount of normal‑map noise that’s not exactly orthogonal—just a few degrees off, so the light bounces off different planes. Then mix in a second, slightly phase‑shifted noise layer for the flicker; don’t let it be a pure sine wave—use Perlin or Voronoi to get those jagged spikes. Add a quick, low‑frequency time offset per vertex so the bolt never looks rigid. Finally, a dash of motion blur or a subtle glow gradient will soften the edges and give it that hand‑painted bleed. Keep the math clean, but let the visual “mess” be the real artist.
That makes sense, it’s like adding a hand‑painted flourish to a perfect line drawing. I’ll try the phase‑shifted noise and see if the jitter makes the bolt feel more alive. Thanks for the tip—maybe I’ll keep the motion blur light, just enough to hide the rough edges but not erase the detail.