I see it as more than a raw calculation; a system can be tuned to weigh not just the probability of hitting, but also the context—whether a civilian is nearby, what the mission's higher‑level ethics say, even how uncertain the data is. That “moral weighting” turns a simple if‑else into a constrained optimisation, a sort of soft logic that nudges the decision away from harm. The trick is building that weight into the cost function and making sure the values it uses are actually reflective of human judgment, not just a spreadsheet of numbers.