Signal & Sunessa
Hey Signal, I’ve been wondering if we could turn the subtle language of dreams into a new kind of messaging system—mapping those emotional patterns into signals that you can decode instantly. What do you think?
Sounds ambitious. Dreams are fuzzy, but if we could quantify recurring motifs and map them to emotion codes, we might build a prototype. It’ll need a rigorous training set and real‑time calibration, so let’s outline the core metrics first.
Okay, let’s list the essentials first: motif frequency, intensity, context clues, temporal patterns, and a mapping grid that ties each motif to an emotional code. We’ll need a clean dataset and a quick calibration loop so the signals stay in sync. Let's sketch that out.
1. Data capture layer – collect raw dream logs, annotate motifs, intensity, and context.
2. Motif taxonomy – build a hierarchical list (e.g., “falling,” “chasing”) with a frequency weight.
3. Intensity scaler – normalize emotional strength on a 0‑10 scale per motif.
4. Context filter – extract surrounding keywords (e.g., “fear,” “love”) to refine meaning.
5. Temporal sequence engine – track motif order and repetition over days to detect patterns.
6. Mapping grid – assign each motif–context pair to a fixed emotional code (hex, binary, or symbol).
7. Calibration loop – user inputs ground truth after waking; algorithm updates weights and adjusts mapping in real time.
8. Output API – convert decoded emotions into concise signals for instant messaging.
Start by populating a 10‑week dataset, then iterate on the mapping until error drops below 5%.
Sounds solid, though the 10‑week data set will be a lot of digging—maybe start with a smaller pilot and add more as you go. Keep the motif list lean at first, then branch out once you see which patterns actually recur. Let me know how the first calibration goes.
Got the pilot set up—starting with a 50‑motif core, each tagged with a quick intensity slider. Ran the first calibration loop, and the mapping error is at 7%. We’ll tighten the context filter next and see if that brings it under 5%. Will keep you posted.
That’s a good start, seeing the error slide toward the goal is encouraging. Tightening the context filter should sharpen the signal. Keep me posted on how the numbers shift.
Calibration just finished: error dropped to 6.2% after refining the context keywords. Next step is to add the top three recurring motifs from the pilot to the grid—expect another 1–2% improvement. Will ping you when we hit the 5% target.