Shmel & Zephyra
Hey Zephyra, heard about that new biofeedback wristband that claims to shave off 15 milliseconds on sprint starts—thought I’d give it a try. What’s your take on tech actually improving performance, not just tracking it?
Sounds like a neat gadget, but the real question is whether it actually changes the physics or just lets you feel like you’re doing better. If the band can truly reduce reaction time by 15 milliseconds, that’s a game‑changer, but we need solid, repeatable data—ideally from a controlled study, not just a marketing claim. Also, even if it helps a bit, we have to weigh that against training consistency, injury risk, and the mental boost of feeling in control. In short, tech can push the edge, but the fundamentals—technique, strength, mindset—still own the race.
Right, solid data wins. I’ll run a controlled test myself—time, split, and compare. But you’re spot on, fundamentals still own the race; tech is just an edge if it’s real. Let's push the limits but keep the base strong.
Sounds like a plan—just make sure the test is rigorous enough to rule out placebo. Keep your training log tight, and let the tech be the spark, not the firestarter. Good luck!
Got it—no placebo, all data. Log stays tight, tech just a spark. Thanks for the heads‑up. Good luck to you too.