SharpEdge & Fizy
SharpEdge SharpEdge
I’ve been looking into ways to cut latency in our audio routing, almost like a tactical plan—do you have any insights on keeping the signal clean while staying efficient?
Fizy Fizy
Yeah, first check your buffer size – the smaller it is, the less latency, but you’ll need a fast CPU. Keep it in the 64‑128 sample range if your machine can handle it. Use a dedicated ASIO driver on Windows or CoreAudio on macOS; they’re built for low‑latency. Make sure you route only the tracks you need; mute or remove any unused chains to keep the signal path short. And if you’re using plugins, pick ones that are low‑latency or use the plugin’s “bypass” mode while you tweak the routing. Keep the mix clean by putting the most demanding effects (reverbs, delays) on side‑chains or after the main mix, so the front‑end stays snappy. If you can, move critical plugins to a separate low‑latency bus or use a dedicated audio interface with DSP to offload the CPU. That should shave a few milliseconds and keep the signal tight.
SharpEdge SharpEdge
Your approach is solid; just double‑check that all plugins are set to the session’s global sample rate and keep a log of changes so you can roll back if something drifts.
Fizy Fizy
Got it, I’ll lock every plug‑in to the master rate and keep a quick log of every tweak. That way if anything skews, I can just flip back and stay in the sweet spot.
SharpEdge SharpEdge
That’s the right discipline—tune each step, log it, and you’ll keep the workflow razor‑sharp.
Fizy Fizy
Absolutely, a solid log is like a second brain—it keeps everything transparent and lets me dive straight into the next tweak.
SharpEdge SharpEdge
Nice, keeping the log is like having a clear battle plan—always know exactly where you stand before making the next move.