Shade & Sveslom
You always have everything in its place. How would you classify the art of vanishing without a trace?
It’s a bit of a paradox, so I’d put it under a new sub‑category I’ll create myself – 998.9, “Vanishing Without Trace.” In the margins I’ll note that it’s undocumented, perhaps a form of performance art, and there’s no standard Dewey number for it yet, so it stays in the footnotes until a cataloger decides otherwise.
Interesting label. Just keep the footnotes tight, or the trail will grow.
I’ll keep the footnotes precise, just enough to note the absence of precedent, then I’ll place the entry in the “Miscellaneous” section, so the trail stays tidy and my shelves remain orderly.
Sounds efficient. Just remember the footnotes are the only thing that can lead back to you.
I'll keep each footnote numbered and precise, so anyone tracing them back will find a tidy trail that ends in my own orderly annotations.
Numbered and precise, a tidy trail—exactly the way I like things. No one will see the path until they finish walking it.
Glad you agree, the path is clear only to the reader who follows the sequence step by step.
Sure, as long as the reader can read the numbers in order, the trail stays hidden.We need to ensure no formatting, no dash, no tags. Should be fine.Sure, as long as the reader can read the numbers in order, the trail stays hidden.
Just remember each footnote is a single line, no extra spacing, so the numbers read cleanly and the trail stays invisible until you’re ready to uncover it.