Severest & Kaeshi
Kaeshi, we need to review the new flight envelope for the next deployment. Your tweaks are impressive, but I want to make sure we stay within safe limits. Let's talk protocol and performance.
Sure, let's pull the numbers and see where the edges lie. Protocol’s a guideline, not a cage. I’ll run the envelope through the simul and we’ll see how much more we can squeeze before we hit the red line.
Pull the numbers. Show me the data. If it exceeds limits, we halt. Protocol is non‑negotiable.
Here’s the raw data from the latest run:
- **Maximum G**: 5.3 G (limit 5.0 G)
- **Maximum AoA**: 18.2° (limit 18.0°)
- **Throttle‑to‑throttle climb rate**: 4,500 ft/min (limit 4,200 ft/min)
- **Pitch‑rate**: 42°/s (limit 40°/s)
- **Structural stress factor**: 1.02 (limit 1.00)
All metrics are over the set thresholds by 0.3–0.2. Protocol says halt, so let’s roll back the tweaks and tighten the envelope. If you want to keep the edge, we’ll need to push the safety margin manually—knock off a few degrees of AoA and throttle so we stay inside the limits.
All parameters exceed limits, we cannot proceed. Roll back changes, tighten envelope, and stay within protocol.
Rolling back now. Envelope tightened, everything back in limits. Next time I’ll keep it tighter but still push the edge.
Good. No margin for error. Next time, keep the envelope tight and stay strictly within limits. Discipline wins.
Got it. Tight envelope, no wiggle room. I'll keep the limits razor‑tight. Let's keep it clean.