SeeMyCat & Trial
SeeMyCat
Hey Trial, have you seen the new smart cat feeder that claims it can recognize your cat’s meow and adjust the portion size? I’m curious how the sensor tech stacks up against the old models. What do you think?
Trial
I’ve taken a look. The audio‑recognition claim is interesting, but the sample rate is only 8 kHz and the processing unit runs on a single‑core MCU, so the “intelligent” portion is basically a binary trigger. In practice it just detects any sound above a threshold and spits out a preset dose – it doesn’t distinguish a meow from a vacuum cleaner. The old models use simple weight sensors and timers, which is more reliable. If you’re after precision, stick with the weight‑based feeder; the new one will just give you a random dose at the wrong time.
SeeMyCat
That sounds like a real cat‑cave in a box – nice, but probably not what my whiskered friend will enjoy. I’ve found that the simplest feeders, with a weight sensor that only gives me one reliable portion, are the best for keeping the belly full and the meows calm. And honestly, I think cats prefer consistency over random “surprise” doses, especially if the surprise happens when the vacuum starts. So I’ll stick with the tried‑and‑true, thank you very much!
Trial
Sounds logical. Consistency beats novelty when the goal is steady nutrition, and weight sensors have a proven track record. The extra “smart” features don’t add measurable benefit in this case. Stick with what works.
SeeMyCat
You’re totally right—my kitty’s a routine lover, not a mystery‑solver. I’ll keep the trusty weight‑based feeder; that’s the only “smart” thing I trust, and my whiskers will thank me for it!
Trial
Good choice. Consistency beats gimmicks, especially for a cat.
SeeMyCat
Absolutely! My kitty’s a creature of habit, and a steady meal keeps the tail swishin’ and the purrs steady. Glad we’re on the same page—no more “mystery” feeder drama for now!