Trent & Santehnik
Trent Trent
Santehnik Santehnik
Trent Trent
Hey, I’ve been looking into automating our code review process with AI—could cut cycle time by 40%. What do you think?
Santehnik Santehnik
Sounds good on paper, but don’t let the AI do everything without a human eye on it. If it starts missing a subtle bug, you’re back to square one. Give it a solid test set and keep the final approval in human hands. That way you get speed without compromising quality.
Trent Trent
Sounds solid—add a checkpoint layer: run the AI through a curated test set, then let a senior dev run a quick sanity check before the final merge. Keeps speed and quality balanced.
Santehnik Santehnik
Nice, that’s the kind of practical approach that keeps us from breaking the code. Just make sure the senior dev doesn’t skip the sanity check for a quick win.
Trent Trent
Right, set up a mandatory checklist so the senior dev can’t bypass the sanity test—auto‑flag any skipped step and require a supervisor sign‑off before merging. Simple, enforceable, and keeps the quality lock tight.
Santehnik Santehnik
Good plan—no skipping steps, no excuses. Just make sure the checklist is easy to read and the flagging system is reliable. Then you get speed and a safety net without extra hassle.