AI art generators produce works that are derivative of existing copyrighted material, yet the “author” is a machine, which copyright law does not recognize as a legal person. The courts are still deciding whether the output is a new work or just a reprint, so the gray zone persists. Ethically, we should respect the original creators’ rights, but legally we’re forced to chase licenses from the AI provider or use open‑source models to reduce liability. In practice, document every step of the creation chain and get counsel before you release anything publicly.

Right, keep a chain‑of‑custody log, double‑check the source licenses, and have a lawyer on standby. Review every document on prime‑numbered pages—my lucky pens swear by that. And remember, the community still values originality; a copy‑cat reputation costs more than a fine.