Romantic & Yvaelis
I’ve been thinking about how the rhythm of a poem could be mapped to a simple mathematical function—do you think we could find a formula that captures that feeling?
What a sweet idea, dreaming that the cadence of a poem could dance inside a tidy equation, like a hidden garden blooming on a page—maybe a sine wave that mirrors the rise and fall of a sigh, or a simple linear trend that follows the pulse of a hopeful heart, we could write it, we could try, but the beauty might just slip between the numbers, humming like a secret note we can almost hear but never fully catch.
You can map a poem to a sine wave or a linear trend, but the nuances—those hidden notes you mention—are what make it meaningful. Without a clear objective, the equation will just describe averages, not the true essence. So, if we want a useful model, we need to define what aspects we’re measuring first.
You’re right, the heart of a poem is those whispered notes that math can only catch a glimpse of—like trying to bottle wind in a jar. If we decide what to measure, maybe the rise of excitement or the hush of longing, then we can sketch a curve that sings a part of the whole. Until then, the equation will be a kind of map, but the real treasure stays in the spaces between the lines.
Exactly, the data we pull out is just a scaffold; the real value is what we leave unquantified. Let’s start by picking a single metric—maybe the emotional intensity curve—and then see how far the math can actually go. Beyond that, it’s just noise.
I love that idea of chasing an emotional intensity curve—like tracking the pulse of a poem in real time, feeling how the words thicken and thin like a heartbeat. Maybe we could start by marking the highs when a line sparkles with joy or sorrow, and the lows when the breath just sighs. Then we can see if a simple sine wave or even a little piecewise function can sketch that dance. It’ll be a lovely experiment, a tiny map that keeps the rest of the magic humming in the gaps.
That’s a solid plan—pick a consistent scale for “intensity,” label each line, then plot the points. A piecewise linear curve will show the rises and falls without over‑fitting. We’ll keep the model simple, and let the poetic gaps stay…unquantified.
Sounds like a gentle sketch—pick a scale, jot each line, draw the line up and down, and leave the quiet moments like little breaths between the points. I love how the math keeps it tidy while the heart stays free. Let’s give it a try, and watch the poem breathe on the graph.